Chapters 11, Freeway Reliability Analysis, and 17, Urban Street Reliability and ATDM, provide methodologies for evaluating the effects of various strategies—notably ramp metering, managed lanes, and incident management.
In response to the increasing need to estimate the performance measures for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities, as well as the interactions with vehicles, the HCM6 provides tools and methods for the assessments. Chapters 16 through 23 include methods for assessing nonautomobile modes and their interactions with vehicular traffic, and Chapter 24 supplies methods for analyzing off-street pedestrian and transit facilities.
Figure 3 page 19 offers an illustrative example of the relationship between pedestrian volume, effective path width, and average pedestrian speed on the average space for off-street pedestrian facilities. Chapter 15 describes a methodology for evaluating bicycle operations on multilane and two-lane highways; a recent article on multimodal analysis in the HCM6 presents additional information on this topic 4.
Methods for the analysis of interchange ramp terminals and alternative intersections are included in Chapter In addition to the operational and planning-level tools for diamond, partial cloverleaf, and single-point urban interchanges—included in the previous edition of the HCM—this chapter covers methods for the analysis of diverging diamond interchanges Figure 4, right , which are gaining in use, as well as analysis methods for evaluating restricted crossing U-turn intersections, median U-turn intersections, and displaced left-turn intersections.
HCM6 recognizes the need to work with alternative tools on an operational analysis, describes the limitations of each methodology, and offers guidance on the use of simulation and other tools in conjunction with an HCM analysis. In addition, Chapter 6, HCM and Alternative Analysis Tools, explores cases for using alternative tools and simulation to supply additional performance measures not available from HCM6 methods or to analyze highway designs not addressed within the HCM performance measurement framework.
The HCM6 tools generally can be used for quick evaluations and comparisons of multiple scenarios. The analyst can screen the scenarios and select a reasonable number before applying more costly approaches, such as simulation.
Chapter 7 provides guidance for interpreting the results from HCM6 and alternative tools, including sources of uncertainty, the importance of precise definitions in computing performance measures with alternative tools, and comparing the HCM6 results with those from alternative methods. Figure 5 page 20 illustrates the relationship between the HCM6 analyses and alternative tools for corridor and areawide studies. For users interested in planning and preliminary analysis, the companion Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the HCM 6 provides tools for high- and medium-level analyses when the available data are limited.
Typical applications include studies of large areas, studies with horizon years well into the future, and statewide performance monitoring. These types of analyses require simpler methods because of the large number of facilities and can tolerate results that are less precise because of uncertainties in future traffic forecasts or in facility design, or because large-scale data collection is not feasible.
HCM6 still provides methods for the more traditional analysis of uninterrupted facilities, such as freeways, multilane highways, and two-lane highways, and for interrupted facilities, such as urban streets, interchanges, signalized intersections, unsignalized intersections, and roundabouts. Because the methods are based on data from across the United States, analysts can apply the HCM6 values as default values in many other tools.
For example, travel demand models can use the capacity and speed estimates; designs can apply the queue length estimates; evaluations of the operational effects of policy decisions can use the travel time reliability estimates; and evaluations of the impacts of urban street modifications on a bicycle facility can employ the bicycle LOS estimates.
In general, HCM6 provides tools for operational analysis, design analysis, and planning and preliminary engineering analysis. The committee and its subcommittees include representatives from state departments of transportation, local agencies, consulting firms, universities, and the Federal Highway Administration FHWA. The summer meeting often invites the local chapter of the Institute of Transportation Engineers to discuss topics of mutual interest.
All transportation professionals are welcome to participate in committee activities, to provide feedback on HCM methods, and to suggest modifications and additions.
The committee also addresses questions about HCM6 applications, clarifications, and errata. More information on committee activities and upcoming events is available on the committee website.
The Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition: A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis provides a wealth of methods and tools for estimating performance measures in assessing the quality of traffic operations for passenger cars, trucks, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit passengers.
The methods address a range of analyst needs related to the availability and accuracy of input data, including operational analysis, design, planning, and preliminary engineering analysis. The HCM6 provides new tools to estimate travel time reliability, evaluate the impacts of ATDM, assess alternative designs for intersections and interchanges, and estimate multimodal LOS, among others.
The Highway Capacity and Quality of Service Committee welcomes participation and input from all transportation professionals, because broad involvement is essential for the continued success of the HCM. Special Report Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. Elefteriadou, L. Dowling, and P. ITE Journal, February , pp. Dowling, R. Ryus, B. Schroeder, M. Kyte, and T. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement. Multiple transportation modes and their interactions were a major focus in updates and revisions to the Highway Capacity Manual HCM. The Highway Capacity Manual , 6th Edition, consists of a boxed set of three printed volumes in looseleaf binders, plus a fourth volume online. Harbor Boulevard in Orange County, California, in the mids. The edition of the HCM introduced the concept of levels of service, and HCM6 offers tools for additional performance measures.
Tools, Methods, and Resources In one of its most significant enhancements, the HCM6 provides estimates of travel time reliability for freeway systems and for urban street facilities. Carousel Next. What is Scribd? Highway Capacity Manual. Uploaded by PracheeGupta. Document Information click to expand document information Description: Highway capacity manual. Did you find this document useful?
Is this content inappropriate? Report this Document. Description: Highway capacity manual. Flag for inappropriate content. Download now. Related titles. Carousel Previous Carousel Next. Jump to Page. Search inside document. Eauatons ond The exhibit also lists default values suggested for use when site-specific data are not available. There are three ways to estimate FES. Direct Field Measurement Direct field measurement on the subject highway segment is preferred.
Fach directional measuurement should be based on a random sample of at Teast vehicle speeds. The FFS can be directly measured as the mean speed under low-demand conditions i. If the analysis segment cannot be directly observed, then measurements from a similar facility same highway class, same speed limit, similar environment, etc.
In such cases, a speed sample may be taken at higher flow rates and adjusted accordingly. The same sampling approach is taken: each direction is separately observed, with each directional sample including at least observed speeds. This is a greater challenge on two-lane highways than on other types of uninterrupted- flow facilities.
FES on two-lane highways covers a significant range, from as low a8 45 mifh to as high as 70 mifh. To estimate the FS, the analyst must characterize the operating conditions of the facility in terms of a BFFS that reflects the nature of the traffic and the alignment of the facility.
Unfortunately, because of the broad range of speeds that occur and the importance of local and regional factors that influence deiver-desired speeds, little guidance on estimating the BFFS can be given.
As will be seen, once the BFES is determined, adjustments for lane and shoulder widths and for the density of unsignalized access points are applied to estimate the FFS. In concept, the BFFS is the speed that would be expected on the basis of the facility's horizontal and vertical alignment, if standard lane and shoulder widths were present and there were no roadside access points.
Thus, the design speed of the facility might be an acceptable estimator of BEFS, since it is based primarily on horizontal and vertical alignment. Posted speed! A rough estimate of BFFS might be taken as the posted speed limit plus 10 mifh. Guidance on field speed studies is provided in standard traffic engineering texts and elsewhere 3.
Adjustment factors for use in Equation are found in Exhibit lane and shoulder width and Exhibit access-point density 2i0 Upgrades 0.
Note that P,.
0コメント